Bill, a stainless prop might give a bit better performance. If I recall, the OMC stainless props have thinner blades which slice thru the water with greater ease.
You might also take a look at the transom height of your motor; you may be able to raise it up a bit for less drag. I'm assuming it's on the Seafair Sedan and that's not exactly a hi-perf boat, but most rigs do respond to raising the engine a bit from std height.
The biggest concern in doing so would be ventilation during cornering and when the engine is trimmed out. A 4-bladed prop would help with that, although 4 blades ain't necessarily gonna be faster than 3 blades!
Pretty much any older, crank-rated 2-stroke is gonna suck down fuel at a rate per hour of its HP rating divided by 10, at full thottle. I.e., your 85hp will use approx 8.5 GPH at full throttle.
It's a little trickier when trying to figure out a newer motor that is prop-rated, they're gonna burn more at WOT than that formula would indicate, since the formula only works with crank-rated HP values.
If you were to repower with an E-TEC that'd probably be the most fuel-efficient (albeit very expensive) way to go. A 4-stroke is efficient as well, but the weight penalty offsets a lot of that.
Check out this 90hp E-TEC HO, Sweet!
www.boattest.com/engine-review/Evinrude/18500074_E-TEC-90-H-O-_2014
www.thefisherman.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=feature.display&feature_id=676&ParentCat=3
That's a "90" 4-cyl that puts out almost 100HP at the prop!
Even the 3-cyl 90hp would most likely move your boat faster and more efficiently than the old 85hp Beast:
org-www.evinrude.com/en-us/engines/etec_inlines/etec_90_inline
Lighter than its 4-cyl mate, as well.
HTH........ed